If you are wondering where this picture is from, I'll tell you. Although it looks like something out of Platoon, this was an image taken last year in Iraq. It is one of the last pictures taken of an American casualty in Iraq. Rules implemented by military brass last year make it extremely difficult for photographers to publish pictures of wounded or killed soldiers. One of the rules stipulates that the photographer needs written permission from the casualty. It's really hard to get a signature from someone being taken to a battlefield hospital in a helicopter and it's even harder to get a signature from a dead man.That aside, this picture's resemblance of a scene out of Vietnam bring me to my real topic. While all the candidates, as well as the vast majority of Americans ignore Iraq, many of our young men and women are coming back dead or wounded. Hawks point to the fact that there are far fewer deaths than there were in Vietnam. They fail to mention, however, that many of our soldiers are coming back without one or both limbs, other wounds, not to mention the psychological trauma of living through such horror. There have been, luckily I guess, 3,963 deaths in Iraq since the "war" began (it's not a war if it's not declared by Congress, but only the Constitution says that). There have also been 29,133 American wounded in Iraq. That's over 33,000 total casualties in this pointless war. That's far too high a number for the people who said the war would be a rollover victory.
In Vietnam, that war continued because the fear was if we pulled out, Communism would take over all of Asia and then the entire world. We stayed in Vietnam basically over ideology. So why are we staying in Iraq? Numerous reports have shown that not only did Saddam Hussein have no connection with the September 11th attacks, but also that al Qaeda has only grown in Iraq since we invaded the country. Iraq has diverted attention (what little there would be anyway) and resources from the forgotten war being fought in Afghanistan. By the way, bin Laden is still on the loose in Pakistan. We have no real ideological reason for being there. If we really wanted to end all dictatorships, we'd invade North Korea, Pakistan, Zimbabwe, Kenya, Sudan, and a dozen others. Furthermore, terrorism is rarely, if ever, state-sponsored. The thing that's so scary about terrorism is that all your need is pissed off young men, money and bomb-making materials. We went in to get Iraq's oil; we all wanted gas back at 50 cents a gallon.
The reason people started giving a shit about Vietnam is that the government instituted the draft. Once that happened, all the people on college campuses said, "Hold on, man. I'm not going over there to fight your war dude." They got pissed and, in time, we completely pulled out of Vietnam. Sure, many Vietnamese people got killed and that's a terrible thing. The blood is on our hands. If we leave Iraq many, perhaps millions of Iraqis are going to be slaughtered. The real question is how many Americans are we willing to sacrifice in the process? We are going to have to leave eventually, so why delay the inevitable? Why not get out while we can still save some American lives and limbs? We won't be leaving Iraq any time soon. Most Americans don't give a shit and the Democrats in Congress (who got elected to end the war) are a bunch of bed-wetting sissies. As long as they continue to give President Bush billions of dollars to fight this war, the war will continue. Congress needs to read the Constitution, realize that they control federal spending, and turn off the faucet.
I was once told by a professor, "Politics is the most deadly profession in the world." If you want to be in politics, you need to have the fortitude to make decisions that will cause people to die. Nobody wants to do it, but leaders HAVE to do it. Our political leaders now do not have the guts to do so. It is sad that we won't leave because we value Iraqi lives over American ones.
