Friday, January 25, 2008

A Hope for America


Oddly, this post will probably not be the only time I go on for a while about a 72-year-old former gynecologist. Amidst all the talk about Hillary and Obama, McCain, Huckabee and Romney (people finally woke up to realize that Rudy doesn't know anything about how to run the country), one man is forgotten. It is this man to the left. Congressman Ron Paul (R) from Texas, if you didn't know, is running for President. He has crazy ideas about things like personal freedom, constitutionalism, smaller government and ending the war in Iraq just to name a few. Of the five remaining candidates in the Republican race, Ron Paul is the only true Republican remaining. Republicans, traditionally, have stood for smaller federal government, more states' rights and more personal freedom.
Perhaps most importantly, of all the candidates both Democratic and Republican, Ron Paul is the only one who is for the immediate withdrawal of American troops from Iraqi soil. Yes folks, even the beloved Barack would not bring our boys home from Muslim lands. His logic for this is simple: we did the same thing in Vietnam and Vietnam did not fall apart as hawks claim Iraq will. It is simple really, millions of people are going to die in Iraq because of the instability that has plagued that country since the British ended colonial rule in the 1920s. The question is how many Americans do we want to be part of those millions of dead? My answer and Paul's answer is, as few as possible and the easiest way to do so would simply be to leave right now. bin Laden and other terrorists hate us because we are over on their soil. Leaving Iraq would not guarantee that we would never be attacked again, but it would certainly tilt the odds in our favor. Iraq, for the other candidates, is not even a topic of conversation at the debates (to which Paul is usually not even invited despite his rather large following and fundraising capabilities), which is frightening.
Speaking of frightening, I think fear is the reason why more people and the media do not want anything to do with this man, sometimes labelled a "radical". People in this country are too afraid of freedom or they simply don't care that they have none. We think we are all free because we can buy whatever we want or watch whatever we want on television, but this is only freedom to consume. Where is our true freedom, our freedom to live in peace? I shouldn't have to worry about my emails being read or my phone being tapped. I simply want to be left alone. I'll pay my taxes when I'm asked to, but other than that, just let me live. I don't need the government to tell me what to eat, what drugs are bad for me or that cigarettes are bad. I can figure out what is good or bad for me on my own; and even if something is bad for me, it's my choice to be an idiot and do it anyway.
I guess the whole point of this diatribe is that the thing that makes America the greatest country on earth, freedom, is the same thing for which Ron Paul stands. I may not agree with all his policies, but I agree with more of his than do I Hillary's or Huckabee's. America is supposed to be the land of the free. That statement has come into question in recent years. I truly believe that Ron Paul can make America free again.

Monday, December 17, 2007

Mitch the Snitch

For all the big fans of the Quikstop Blog, I apologize for my sporadic blogging since the beginning of the school year. 12 credits of graduate work plus an overseer of a boss. Furthermore, there really hasn't been much that I've felt I needed to write about. That being said, the release last week of the much-anticipated Mitchell Report really grinded my gears.

Former United States Senator and Northern Ireland peace broker George Mitchell released his report last Thursday. The report stated that steroid use in baseball was wide-spread and that the League and the Commissioner should take immediate action. Furthermore, the report named dozens of current and former baseball players accused of using steroids and/or HGH.

Who cares?

Even the most casual of baseball fans knows that plenty of ball players have been juicing for years. Why wouldn't they? Hitting 40 homers with 120 RBIs in a season means millions for these guys with few other skills. How many among us wouldn't inject ourselves with something if it meant the chance of financial security for ourselves and our families for the rest of our lives? Professional sports are just that, a profession. The whole point of a profession is to make money. Begging, stealing and cheating are all part of the game. Hell, it's the American way. No one ever called Rockefeller or Carnegie a cheater. The Mitchell Report, through evidence which is hearsay at best, has told baseball fans nothing knew and muddied the good names of current and former baseball players. David Justice, "Mr. Playoffs" was named in the report and all he did is inquire about how to get steroids; he never took them. Regardless, his career achievements are brought into question just because a locker room attendant was trying to avoid jail time for selling steroids.

All sorts of baseball writers and commentators always talk about baseball as part of America and its history. Then why are we, as Americans and as baseball fans, so shocked when scandal arises? Scandal, cheating and corruption have always existed in American life, so why should America's sport be any different from the rest of American society? 100 years from now, the steroid era will be nothing but a minor period in baseball and America's history. It is arrogant of us to think that this is the biggest scandal ever to hit baseball simply because it is in our time. Individual players may have gained an unfair advantage but umpires weren't fixing games or anything like that (i.e. soccer in Italy).

Considering that the major focus of Mitchell's report was to "move forward and look towards the future", it is pointless and damaging that he has ruined the reputations of many a good player in an effort to tell Major League Baseball, its owners, players and fans nothing they didn't already know. Did we really need to spend $20 million to learn that Roger Clemens took steroids? Umm, no. I would have done the same thing for a pair of bleacher seats and a hot dog at a Yankees v. Royals game. The whole report is just pointless. I'm going to watch baseball next year no matter what. The whole point of people watching baseball is for entertainment. Watching baseball makes us forget about all the other crap going on in our lives for a few hours. If nothing else, steroids made the game more entertaining. We must all ask ourselves as Maximus the Gladiator asked us, "Are you not entertained?!" We were all entertained in 1998 with the McGwire/Sosa chase for 61; they were both on steroids. To condemn all these players to baseball hell is hypocritical and un-American. I am still going to love and follow baseball with a deep passion. Derek Jeter is still the man and I still hate the Red Sox (but god dammit do I respect them). Those things will never change. Sen. Mitchell, thanks for peace in Northern Ireland and thanks for wasting my time.

Monday, October 1, 2007

Shitty Wok

The media has made much of the 2008 Summer Olympics being held in Beijing. Finally, this Communist country will be opening it self up to Western democratic nations. China will be putting its incredible mix of capitalism and communism on display for all the world. China has indeed made an astronomic leap in the past few years to become a world economic and military superpower. Many people say "Hooray for China!" These Olympics will be the final step in China opening up its borders to unlimited Free Trade from the West. I mean a market of one billion people who all have jobs should give even the most amateur economist a reason to wake up in the morning.

No country, however, can make such an economic and military jump forward without buckets of blood. China is the biggest importer of Sudanese oil. china is the biggest financial supporter of the corrupt and oppressive Burmese government. China is a supporter of Kim Jong Il in North Korea for they want peace on all their borders Chinese products sold in the United States and around the world have proven to be toxic at best and lethal at worst. China's government is very beneficial to the very small urban population of the country, but keeps the vast majority of its rural population in medieval times. An estimated 900 million Chinese are rural farmers; their number more than doubles that of those living in the cities (an estimated 400 million).

Perhaps worst of all, however, is China's support, whether explicitly or tacitly of the corrupt and oppressive governments of Burma and Sudan. The guns used for genocide in Dar Fur on are bought from China and the Sudanese government makes millions and is legitimized by selling most of its oil to China. China will do nothing to oust government in Burma that said results of a democratic election in 1988 were not valid. It has, by extension, supported a government that forces its own citizens into slavery with rape, imprisonment and death as the only alternatives to a life of enslavement.

So, what is to be done? I have a fairly simple solution. Since no one watches the Olympics anymore anyways, I suggest that we all boycott the Beijing Olympics. China has done nothing to earn the Olympics and sowing millions into an already corrupt country will only reap more corruption. American athletes should not go. American athletes have nothing to prove; we know we can destroy everybody in basketball, track and field, etc. If America truly wants to take a stand against a totalitarian and corrupt regime, it will not sponsor of send athletes of Beijing in August. If there is one things human beings are good at, it is repeating mistakes. Supporting the 2008 Beijing Olympics will be repeating the mistake of supporting Hitler's 1936 Berlin Olympics. Let's not have blood on our hands again in the name of sporting competition.

Sunday, August 19, 2007

TV Timeout

I have officially had it with ESPN. Here's why: As I always do on Sunday evenings, I check out the 7 o'clock edition of Baseball Tonight on ESPN to see all the highlights of a Sunday of baseball. Today's show had a theme. Bar and bat mitzvahs have themes, proms have themes, Sweet 16s have themes; not Baseball Tonight. The theme was cards, as in playing cards. Considering all the great pitchers pitching today, they talked about which aces were pitching and then which team had an ace up their sleeve heading into the last 6 weeks of the season and then to top it off, the top 3 Cardinals home runs of all time. To make matters even worse, Steve Berthiaume of SNY, the Mets network (Yankee fans will understand the implied disrespect), fame was host. Why in God's name does Baseball Tonight need a theme? Anybody who watches the show just wants to see nothing but baseball highlights. The whole point of the program was to cut out all the bullshit of SportsCenter and get right to what SC is actually supposed to show: highlights.

The whole episode is emblematic of the problem with ESPN. ESPN, for some reason or another, panders to the casual sports fan with their "Who's Now" (newsflash: every athlete still playing is now, they aren't "later" or "in a while") bracket and their Chris Connelly and Bob Holtzman human interest stories about retarded kids with one eye, one leg and AIDS who shoot a 120 at the local golf course. Worst of all is the ESPY Awards. Its a chance for Stuart "Looking At The Camera And The Coffee Machine" Scott, Dana "Too Tall" Jacobson, Trey "For Real Man, What's Your Real Name?" Wingo to feel important as they interview Nelly and Peyton Manning one after the other and feel like ESPN actually matters for something.

ESPN is to sports what MTV is to music. You can watch either for hours and hours and see neither sports nor music. Poker is not a sport. The Real World is not music. ESPN is an acronym for Entertainment and Sports Programming Network. I would be very entertained if SportsCenter would simply show a baseball, football or (God forbid) hockey higlight in its entirety and then show complete stats, not just two lines next to the score. ESPN used to do this, but it no longer can because actual games are less important than knowing about a drug addict who runs marathons high on meth (how inspiring!).

SportsCenter, and now unfortunately Baseball Tonight have lost touch with their original purposes: to show all the days sports highlights. There is no reason for themes or popularity votes or in depth stories about steroids and dog fighting. As an avid sports fan, I just want to see highlights. If I were a casual sports fan, I would just think ESPN was lame. I know this whole thing is hypocritical as I am watching ESPN as I write this, but hypocritical does not mean incorrect. ESPN needs to take a timeout. Just go off the air for like a month or so and then realize how far away they are from being a true sports network. There are baseball, basketball and or hockey games played virtually every night, yet ESPN shows only a few (in hockey's case none) a week. It is sad and pathetic that ESPN has more time slots devoted to poker than to real sports. Sports fans only need sports and casual fans can only get into sports by actually watching them. Take a timeout ESPN, get pumped and show some full highlights.

Wednesday, August 8, 2007

756 Doesn't Get You 1

Congratulation to Barry Bonds for breaking Hank Aaron's career home run record last night with homer #756. Regardless of the rampant accusations of steroid and HGH use, the man still hit the ball over the fence a lot of times. In addition to that, Barry Bonds, with or without steroids would still finish his career as one of the best all-around baseball players of all time. This brings me to my point for this blog: Bonds' legacy. Sure Bonds is top in a multiple of offensive and defensive. I mean 7 MVPs, 13 All-Star selections and 6 Gold Gloves is pretty impressive even with steroids. But there is one number Bonds possesses that few seem to mention in his chase for 756. That number is 0; as in the number of World Series rings Bonds has.

Can you really consider an individual player in a team sport the greatest of all time if he has not done what it takes to help his team win a championship? Q certainly does not think so. Bonds can have all the offensive records he wants, but honestly, what difference does it make if you don't have a ring? Barry Bonds will go down in history as the Dan Marino of MLB (or I sincerely hope so). Sports fans forever will say, "Yea, he was awesome in the regular season, but he couldn't and didn't do shit when it actually mattered." In my opinion, that is the single greatest insult to be placed on a "great" player. I mean, Joe Montana doesn't have to do Nutrisystem commericials, but Dan Marino does. The difference? Championships. The same will be for Bonds. In the end, what is really the point of individual accomplishments in a team sport especially when your team doesn't win?

Q's two favorite baseball players are Derek Jeter and Paul O'Neill. You won't find either one at the top of any offensive list, except maybe batting average, but they have 4 and 5 rings respectively. Why? Because they are team players. They know/knew what it takes to win as and with a team. Sure, people will always remember Bonds 73rd and 756th home runs, but no one can legitimately call him the greatest of all time because he has not fulfilled the one thing all baseball players are paid to do: win. Bonds has great individual regular season numbers, but he also has a .245 post season batting average and 0 rings. A great player, absolutely. The greatest of all time, absolutely not.

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

For The Dogs

Once again, it has been awhile. Quikstop has been really busy moving down to Va. Tech and starting my new job, so hopefully you can excuse me. Well I'm back because there is just so much going on right now, I just couldn't resist blogging it up.

Let's see, what should I talk about? Well, in honor of my being at VT, I think I will discuss the Michael Vick dog fighting investigation. It looks as if Michael Vick may never play for the Atlanta Falcons again because his house in Virginia was the center of a huge illegal dog fighting ring. As the former owner of an awesome German Shepherd, the fact that innocent dogs were electrocuted, hung and killed is nauseating. PETA has threatened to protest the NFL if Commissioner Roger Goodell does not severely punish Vick for his alleged actions (if I recall people were innocent until proven guilty in this country, but oh well). This brings me to my major problem with this "scandal" and PETA people in general. Michael Vick's actions were certainly questionable at best and deplorable at worst, but at least he didn't harm any PEOPLE. Should the FBI really be investigating dog fighting instead of terrorism or organized crime?

I'm not at all a fan of cruelty to any animals, (excepts cows and calves, they are just too tasty) but seriously people. Considering the deplorable things happening to actual human beings these days, should Michael Vick be a front-page story or the subject of a federal investigation? I don't think so. Almost two years after Hurricane Katrina, people in New Orleans are still living in a 3rd World situation (but it's cool because the Saints drafted Reggie Bush). Thousands are meaninglessly slaughtered in Dar Fur on a daily basis. Jews are still murdering Palestinians and vice versa. 190,000 American Veterans are homeless on the streets. These are real problems that mean the death of millions of innocent people every year, and yet Michael Vick's dead dogs are what everyone seems to care about.

What sickens me most about Vick-gate '07 is that if Michael Vick wasn't a $100 million athlete and the starting Quarterback for the Atlanta Falcons, no one would give a damn about the dead dogs. Have we become such star fuckers in this country that crime only matters if done by or to the famous? Dog fights go one everyday somewhere in America, but when Michael Vick runs it it becomes a national scandal. People don't give a shit about the dogs, they care about getting their faces on television. So PETA, the FBI, the NFL, ESPN are all dogs, because a dog likes nothing more than getting attention.

Wednesday, July 4, 2007

It's Been A While

Hello all. Sorry it has been so long since I last blogged but it's been a busy month and a half. I graduated from the University of Maryland after enduring possibly the longest, most boring, worst commencement speech of all time. In short, the speech discussed how progress wasn't real, it was merely an idea. Shortly thereafter, I went to Europe for a month. Here are some things I learned:
1. ALL Spanish guys walk around like they are the shit, yet many of them have not yet gotten the 1993 memo that the mullet is not and has never been fashionable.
2. Paris is the most overrated city on Earth and there is certainly nothing romantic about it. Furthermore, the Mona Lisa is the most overrated painting on Earth.
3. Amsterdam is the shit.
4. The Heineken Factory tour is the best 11 Euros one can spend on the continent.
5. NOBODY in Europe likes immigrants.
6. EVERYBODY hates George W. Bush. Literally every time I told people I was from the United States, the response was, "Well, you didn't vote for Bush did you?"

It was really an awesome trip. I was in Madrid when Real Madrid won La Liga which was out of control and I got to see Cannavaro, Beckham, Sergio Ramos, Casillas and all those dudes up close and personal which was certainly a once in a lifetime experience. Anybody who would like to go back with me, please let me know.

When I returned from Europe, there was one thing that I had been looking forward to since I left: the last 2 episodes of The Sopranos. So, regardless of my fatigue and jetlag, I stayed up until 2 in the morning the night I got back to watch the final two. The second to last one was undoubtedly one of the best hours in television history. The finale was a good episode right up until the end. The killing off of Phil Leotardo (btw, Frank Vincent always plays the douche bag Guinea wise guy in everything) was classic. But to end The Sopranos, one of the best shows ever on television with fucking "Don't Stop Believin'" by Journey is just pitiful. To end a fine television show with an played out song that people only listen to because it's so bad is despicable. We the viewers were all left with so many questions. What ends up happening to Tony? Will A.J. finally get his ass kicked as we've been hoping for since he grew that stupid as chin strap? What ever happened to Meadow's fiance "Yanks in 4, I was there" Finn? To just cut to black and make me think that my On Demand was broken was just terrible, so terrible. Instead of having some balls and making something, anything happen to Tony Sopranos, David Chase decided to have him eat Funions. I've always said that the show should have ended after Season 5; Season 6 was a whole lot of nothing. Ever since they killed off Aidriana and got rid of the only hot girl on the show just has not been the same, by which I mean good. I feel bad that I chose to watch The Sopranos instead of Family Guy Sundays at 9pm.

Happy 231st Birthday America!